AI Explorer · Tier 1 endpoint hypothesis
Reads JupiterSec's recon model and proposes the endpoints + vuln classes most likely to harbour real bugs. Narrows the search before any probe fires.
Last updated Jun 9, 2026
What it is
Tier 1 is the first stage of the three-tier Deep Audit AI Explorer. It runs after JupiterSec finishes recon and the Triager judges the static findings. Its job is to propose which endpoints + vulnerability classes are worth probing with the heavier Tier 2 scenarios.
Tier 1 reads:
- JupiterSec’s clustered endpoint model (URLs, methods, params, auth requirements)
- The Triager’s confirmed findings (so it doesn’t repeat work)
- The list of in-scope authentication credentials (labels only: plaintext never appears in prompts)
It produces a ranked list of candidate (endpoint, vuln_class)
pairs. Each candidate has a hypothesis (“this /api/orders/{id}
endpoint accepts an integer ID and lacks an org check, likely
IDOR”) and a confidence score.
What it produces
Up to ~40 candidates per scan. Each carries:
kind: one of the supported vuln classes (idor, oauth_redirect, jwt_confusion, mass_assignment, etc.)url+methodevidence: Tier 1’s reasoningconfidence: 0-1 score used to prioritise Tier 2 dispatch
Why it matters
A naive open-ended LLM hunt on a 200-endpoint app burns budget fast and produces noise. Tier 1 narrows the search to the 30-40 most-promising probe targets, before Tier 2’s scenario playbooks (which are expensive: they probe live) ever run.
How it fits with Tier 2 and Tier 3
| Tier | Role | Model |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 (this) | Hypothesis generation over the recon inventory | Sonnet |
| Tier 2 | Scripted scenario playbooks per candidate | Sonnet |
| Tier 3 | Open-ended hunt on the full recon bundle | Opus |